18 Comments

Very well researched and very informative....thank you for that balanced perspective.... whenever I've thought about the issues surrounding Seneca's character I've often asked myself how would I behave if I was in a similar situation, probably not as well....hahaha.... Sometimes it's so easy for us to pass judgement on something of which we know very little about....we know little of his intentions and motives and what interior forces were driving him at the time...

And when I reflect on the content of his writings I've often felt a sense of gratitude and inspiration at the depth of meaning and practicality of the words he wrote...... It's very difficult to conceive that someone with bad intentions could write in such a manner.....

"You are mistaken if you think that you will get any assistance from this quarter; it is not a physician that dwells here, but a sick man"..

Sounds like a very honest admission from someone who felt that he still had a long way to go.......

Of all the Roman Stoics Epictetus is still my favourite, but Seneca's writings are impressive and so practical that they can't be ignored.

Thanks again...

Expand full comment

Was not aware of Senecas negative reputation. I’ve read/re-read him many times, for many years; he’s actually my favorite Stoic ‘read’. I’d shutter to think ( not really 😝; that’s out of my control ) what impression people who don’t know me would think if they were reading what “enemies’ wrote of me…

Expand full comment
founding

My personal opinion is that accusations of sexism against Seneca are overblown. He was a man of his times and no doubt took as a given the gender roles assigned by his society. Heaven knows, women of his day, given their straitened circumstances, had plenty to be angry about, so perhaps his "accusation" was merely an observation.

I dare say the time may come, probably when all of our bones have long since turned to dust, when the anti-male sentiments of today's mainstream (not to mention "radical") feminists will be branded as personal failings.

Expand full comment

Thank you this article, perfect start to my three day weekend. Yesterday at lunch we were talking about Elon Musk and the modern billionaire class and my conclusion about them rings true for Seneca as well - I believe that beyond a certain point wealth becomes not an indifferent, preferred or not, but a vice that leads to the corruption of character. Heresy in our consumerist society, but the longer I live the more convinced I am that I have been blessed by fortune never to have won the lotteries I used to buy tickets for in my younger days! I learn much from Seneca, both in his explanations of Stoic philosophy and his successes and failures in living them. I love how Seneca describes this as a disease., an ulcer in his breast. I can't help but think how easily Diogenes would have cured Seneca's illness, dragging him from his estate and moving him into a barrel!

Have a nice weekend!

Expand full comment

Once again, Massimo Pigliucci shows me how little I know--and how complex the ancient world was. Thanks, friend.

Expand full comment

In addition to your points about Seneca specifically, what do you think of the argument that regardless of a historical philosopher's lifestyle or explicit or implicit support of unacceptable views by modern standards (i.e. sexism, racism), their philosophical views should be examined on the merits of the argument? So in this specific case, regardless of how Seneca lived his life, his works should one, not be ignored and two, evaluated based upon their merit.

Expand full comment

We accept accounts of Stoicism from ancient hostile sources such as Sextus Empiricus as accurately describing Stoic doctrine. Why the fuss with accepting accounts from a flawed Stoic?

Expand full comment