Figs in Winter, by Massimo Pigliucci

Share this post
Plato’s mistake
figsinwinter.substack.com

Plato’s mistake

Why it’s a bad idea to model one’s metaphysics on the rigor of mathematics

Massimo Pigliucci
Sep 12, 2022
13
10
Share this post
Plato’s mistake
figsinwinter.substack.com
Plato’s Academy mosaic from the villa of T. Siminius Stephanus in Pompeii, Wikimedia.

What is your take on metaphysics? Mine is not particularly positive. At least, I am deeply suspicious, and largely reject, the whole approach to the field known as “analytic” metaphysics, which has been dominant since the beginning of the 20th century. (I am increasingly skeptical of the value of all analytic philosophy, but that’s a story for another time. And no, I’m no friend of the continental tradition either!)

My favorite whipping boy is a leading analytic metaphysician, David Chalmers, who initially became famous for his notions about consciousness and philosophical zombies, and has more recently embraced equally problematic notions like panpsychism. Chalmers and his colleagues proposed their “theories” on the basis of their intuitions and of what they find “conceivable,” regardless of whether there is any empirical evidence for their speculation. Indeed, they tend to be contemptuous of empirical evidence, dismissing it as the result of a “reductionist” approach to understanding things.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Figs in Winter, by Massimo Pigliucci to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2023 Massimo Pigliucci
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing