νέα ἐϕ’ ἡμέρῃ ϕρονέοντϵς
(Thinking new thoughts every day)
—Democritus, 5th century BCE
Turns out, the word “innovation” ain’t new at all. It’s earliest known use is in Greek (of course): kainotomia, and is found in a fifth century BCE comic play by Aristophanes. Funny, since the Greeks are often (and falsely) said not to have been innovators.
Armand D’Angour, the translator of How to Innovate, reminds us that, actually, the Greeks invented the alphabet (borrowing and adapting from earlier attempts by the Phoenicians), philosophy, logic, rhetoric, mathematical proofs, theatrical drama, rational medicine, monetary coinage, lifelike sculpture, competitive athletics, architectural standards, self-governing city states, and democracy. Not bad, yeah?
In fact, the Greeks also attempted to understand what makes innovation possible in the first place. In particular, Aristotle (384-322 BCE) was the first to analyze the logic of change itself. In Book 1 of his Physics he starts out by refuting Parmenides’s notion that change is illusory because it is metaphysically impossible. He then arrives at the conclusion that the new is hardly ever completely new, but depends in complex ways on the old. In Book 2 of Politics, Aristotle then tackles change at the political level, aiming to discover the best way to organize a society, or polis.
Two millennia later the thinkers of the Renaissance began their own quest for innovation by going back to the classics, recreating and adapting ideas about music, art, and science that were originally developed by the Greeks.
How to Innovate explores what Aristotle has to say about innovation in Physics and Politics, adding a selection of shorter texts on specific examples. One concerns the construction of the famous Syracusia, a giant battleship that prompted Archimedes to discover the principle of buoyancy. (Think Eureka!, Eureka!) A second example focuses on the contrarian strategy deployed by the Theban general Epaminondas at the Battle of Leuctra in 371 BCE. And the last example details a competition for the invention of new weapons set up by the Syracusan tyrant Dionysius I, which resulted in the invention of the catapult.
The following are some highlights from How to Innovate, with accompanying brief commentaries:
“The earliest philosophers were misled in their search for truth and the nature of things by their naive outlook, which led them down a blind alley. They claimed that nothing can either come to be or cease to be, on the grounds that what comes to be must do so either from what is or from what is not. In their view neither of these is possible, since on the one hand what exists cannot come into existence because it already exists, and on the other nothing can come into existence from nothing—there must be something preexistent.” (Aristotle, Physics, 1)
Here Aristotle summarizes Parmenides’s argument against the very possibility of change. He then goes on to discuss a number of examples that contradict Parmenides. For instance, animals come from animals, and animals of particular kinds—say, dogs—come from animals of particular kinds. This is possible because the resulting creature already has the property of being an animal, a property that does not come out of nowhere. And yet, it is the property that pre-exists, not the specific animal, that is, the dog. Aristotle did’t know anything about genetics, but he was describing a process of becoming that is made possible by the laws of inheritance.
From a modern perspective it is interesting to ask how Aristotle—or, for that matter, Parmenides—would have accounted for evolution, a possibility that had actually been raised (though, obviously, not in Darwinian terms) by the Presocratic philosophers Anaximander and Empedocles.
“The construction of the ship built by Hieron of Syracuse, overseen by the mathematician Archimedes, is worthy of commemoration. … The material for its construction was wood procured from Etna, in sufficient quantity for the building of sixty quadriremes. … It was only by constructing a screw windlass, which was an invention of Archimedes, that it was possible to move a hull of such enormous size down to the sea. … The ship was constructed to hold twenty banks of rowers and had three decks. … All the cabins had a mosaic floors made from a variety of stones, arranged to amazing effect to depict the whole story of the Iliad. … The uppermost deck contained a gymnasium, and boardwalks in proportion to the size of the ship, in which were planted colorful flowerbeds brimming with flowers, which were watered by concealed lead piping. … Adjoining these was a six-square-meter temple to Aphrodite, with a floor made of agate and other precious stones from Sicily. … Adjoining the temple to Aphrodite was a ten-square-meter library with walls and doors made of boxwood, containing a collection of books.” (Athenaeus of Naucratis, The Learned Banqueters, Book 5)
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Figs in Winter: New Stoicism and Beyond to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.